Saturday, September 30, 2023

Low-Noise and Power Amplifiers in Wireless Designs

 

Understanding the Basics of Low-Noise and Power Amplifiers in Wireless Designs

By Bill Schweber

Contributed By Electronic Products

The push for performance, miniaturization, and higher-frequency operation is challenging the limits of two critical, antenna-connected components of a wireless system: the power amplifier (PA) and the low-noise amplifier (LNA). This shift has been spurred by the efforts to make 5G a reality, as well as PA and LNA use in VSAT terminals, microwave radio links, and phased-array radar systems.

These applications have requirements that include lower noise (for the LNA) and greater efficiency (for the PA), as well as operation at higher frequencies, up to and beyond 10 GHz. To meet these increasing demands, LNA and PA manufacturers are moving from traditional all-silicon processes toward gallium arsenide (GaAs) for LNAs and gallium nitride (GaN) for PAs.

This article will explain the role and requirements of LNAs and PAs and their main characteristics, before introducing typical GaAs and GaN devices and what to keep in mind when designing with them.

The sensitive role of the LNA

The function of the LNA is to take the extremely weak and uncertain signal from the antenna, usually on the order of microvolts or under -100 dBm, and amplify it to a more useful level, usually about one-half to one volt (Figure 1). To help put this in perspective, in a 50 Ω system, 10 μV is -87 dBm and 100 μV equals -67 dBm.

While providing this gain itself is not a major challenge with modern electronics, it is severely compromised by any noise that the LNA may add to the weak input signal. This noise can overwhelm any benefits of the amplification that the LNA adds.

Diagram of LNA of the receive path and the PA of the transmit path

Figure 1: The low-noise amplifier (LNA) of the receive path and the power amplifier (PA) of the transmit path connect to the antenna via a duplexer, which separates the two signals and prevents the relatively powerful PA output from overloading the sensitive LNA input. (Image source: DigiKey)

Note that the LNA functions in a world of unknowns. As the front end of the receiver channel, it must capture and amplify a very low-power, low-voltage signal plus associated random noise that the antenna presents to it within the bandwidth of interest. In signal theory, this is called the unknown signal/unknown noise challenge, the most difficult of all signal-processing challenges.

For LNAs, the primary parameters are noise figure (NF), gain, and linearity. Noise is due to thermal and other sources, with typical noise figures in the 0.5 to 1.5 dB range. Typical gain is between 10 and 20 dB for a single stage. Some designs use cascaded amplifiers with a low-gain, low-NF stage, followed by a higher-gain stage that may have higher NF, but this is less critical once the initial signal has been "gained up." (For more on LNAs, noise, and RF receivers, see the TechZone article “Low-Noise Amplifiers Maximize Receiver Sensitivity.”)

Nonlinearity is another issue for the LNA, as the resultant harmonics and intermodulation distortion corrupt the received signal and make demodulating and decoding it with sufficiently low bit error rate (BER) more difficult. Linearity is usually characterized by the third-order intercept point (IP3), which relates nonlinear products caused by the third-order nonlinear term to the linearly amplified signal; the higher the IP3 value, the more linear the amplifier performance.

Power consumption and efficiency in the LNA are generally not the primary concerns. By their nature, most LNAs are fairly low-power devices with current consumption from 10 to 100 mA, and they are providing voltage gain to subsequent stages, not delivering power to a load. Also, there are only one or two LNA channels in the system (the latter usually in diversity antenna designs such as for Wi-Fi and 5G interfaces), so any savings from using a lower-power LNA would be modest.

Other than their operating frequency and bandwidth, there is a relatively large amount of functional similarity among LNAs. Some LNAs also include gain control so the amplifier can handle a wide dynamic range of input signals without overload and saturation. Such widely varying input-signal strength is a common occurrence in mobile applications where the base station-to-phone path loss can have a wide range, even during a single connection cycle.

The routing of input signals to an LNA, and the output signals from it, is as important as the specifications of the part itself. Therefore, designers must use sophisticated modeling and layout tools to realize the LNA’s full performance potential. A superior part can easily be degraded by poor layout or impedance matching, so it is critical to use vendor-provided Smith charts (see, “The Smith Chart: An 'Ancient' Graphical Tool Still Vital In RF Design”), along with credible models of the circuit to support simulation and analysis software.

For these reasons, nearly all vendors of high-performance LNAs which operate in the GHz range offer an evaluation board or verified pc-board layout since every aspect of test setup is critical, including layout, connectors, grounding, bypassing, and power. Without these resources, designers will waste time trying to assess the part's performance in their application.

An example of a GaAs-based LNA is the HMC519LC4TR, an 18 to 31 GHz pHEMT (pseudomorphic high-electron-mobility transistor) device from Analog Devices (Figure 2). This leadless 4 × 4 mm ceramic surface-mount package offers small-signal gain of 14 dB along with a low 3.5 dB noise figure and a high IP3 of +23 dBm. It draws 75 mA from a single +3 V supply.

Diagram of Analog Devices HMC519LC4TR GaAs LNA

Figure 2: The HMC519LC4TR GaAs LNA provides gain with low noise for low-level inputs from 18 to 31 GHz; most of the package connections are for power rails, ground, or unused. (Image source: Analog Devices)

There is a design progression from its simple functional block diagram to the multiple external capacitors of differing values and types needed to provide proper RF bypassing with low parasitics on three power-rail feeds, designated Vdd (Figure 3).

Diagram of Analog Devices HMC519LC4TR LNA

Figure 3: In a real-world application, the HMC519LC4TR LNA requires multiple bypass capacitors on its power rails – all of the same voltage rating – to provide both bulk capacitance for low-frequency filtering as well as smaller-value capacitors for RF bypassing to minimize RF parasitics. (Image source: Analog Devices)

This enhanced schematic leads to the evaluation board, which details both layout and BOM, including use of non-FR4 pc-board material (Figure 4(a) and 4(b)).

Image of board layout schematic

Figure 4(a)

Image of LNA BOM

Figure 4(b)

Figure 4: Given the high frequencies at which these LNA front ends operate, and the low-level signals they must capture, a detailed, tested, evaluation design is essential. This includes a schematic (not shown), board layout (a), and BOM, with specifics of passive components and pc-board material (b). (Image source: Analog Devices)

A GaAs LNA for even higher frequencies is the MACOM MAAL-011111, which supports 22 to 38 GHz operation (Figure 5). It offers 19 dB small-signal gain, along with a 2.5 dB noise figure. This LNA appears to be a single-stage device, but internally it actually has three cascaded stages. The first stage is optimized for lowest noise and moderate gain, while the subsequent ones provide additional gain.

Diagram of MACOM MAAL-011111 LNA

Figure 5: To the user, the MAAL-011111 LNA appears to be a single-stage amplifier, but internally it uses a series of gain stages designed to maximize input-to-output signal-path SNR, while adding significant gain at the output. (Image source: MACOM)

Like the Analog Devices' LNA, the MAAL-011111 needs only a single low-voltage supply and is tiny at just 3 × 3 mm. The user can adjust and trade off some performance specifications by setting the bias (supply) voltage at different values between 3.0 and 3.6 V. The suggested board layout shows the critical pc-board copper dimensions needed to maintain proper impedance matching and ground-plane performance (Figure 6).

Diagram of MACOM’s MAAL-011111 layout

Figure 6: The suggested layout for getting the most out of MACOM’s MAAL-011111, while also providing input and output impedance matching. Note the use of pc-board copper for impedance-controlled transmission lines as well as low-impedance ground planes (dimensions in millimeters). (Image source: MACOM)

The PA drives the antenna

In contrast to the LNA's difficult signal-capture challenge, the PA takes a relatively strong signal with very-high SNR from the circuitry, and must boost its power. All the general factors about the signal are known, such as amplitude, modulation, shape, duty cycle, and more. This is the known-signal/known-noise quadrant of the signal-processing map, and the easiest one to manage.

The primary parameter for the PA is its power output at the frequency of interest, with typical PA gain spanning between +10 and +30 dB. Along with gain, efficiency is the other critical PA parameter, but any assessment of efficiency is complicated by the usage model, modulation, duty cycle, allowable distortion, and other aspects of the signal to be boosted. PA efficiencies are in the 30 to 80% range, but this is very dependent on many factors. PA linearity, also critical, is judged by IP3, just as for the LNA.

While many PAs use CMOS technology at lower power levels (up to about 1 to 5 W), in recent years other technologies have matured and are also in widespread use, especially at higher power levels where efficiency is critical both for battery life and thermal considerations. PAs using GaN offer better efficiency at higher power levels and higher frequencies (typically above 1 GHz), where several watts or more are needed. GaN PAs are cost competitive, especially when efficiency and power dissipation are factored in.

The Cree/Wolfspeed CGHV14800F, a 1200 to 1400 MHz, 800 W device, is representative of some of the most recent GaN-based PAs. This HEMT PA's combination of efficiency, gain, and bandwidth is optimized for pulsed L-band radar amplifiers, allowing designers to find many uses in applications such as air traffic control (ATC), weather, antimissile, and target-tracking systems. Using a 50 V supply, it provides typical drain efficiency of 50% and higher, and comes in a 10 × 20 mm ceramic package with metal flanges for cooling (Figure 7).

Image of Cree/Wolfspeed CGHV14800F

Figure 7: The 10 × 20 mm ceramic package with metal flanges of the CGHV14800F 1200 to 1400 MHz, 800 W, GaN PA must simultaneously meet difficult RF and dissipation requirements. Note the mounting flanges for screwing – not soldering – the package to the pc-board for mechanical and thermal integrity. (Image source: Cree/Wolfspeed)

The CGHV14800F operates from a 50 V supply, typically providing a power gain of 14 dB with > 65% drain efficiency. As with LNAs, evaluation circuits and reference designs are essential (Figure 8).

Image of Cree demonstration circuit provided for the CGHV14800F PA

Figure 8: The demonstration circuit provided for the CGHV14800F PA requires very few components besides the device itself, but physical layout and thermal considerations are critical; the PA is held to the board with screws and nuts (on the bottom, not visible) via package flanges which serve both mounting integrity and thermal objectives. (Image source: Cree/Wolfspeed)

Equally important, among the many specification tables and performance curves is the power dissipation de-rating curve (Figure 9). This shows available power output rating versus case temperature, and indicates the maximum allowed power is constant up to 115⁰C, then decreases linearly up to its 150⁰C maximum rating.

Graph of derating curve of a PA

Figure 9: Due to its role in delivering power, the derating curve of a PA is needed to show designers the reduction in allowed output power as case temperature increases. Here, the power rating drops rapidly after 115C. (Image source: Cree/Wolfspeed)

MACOM also offers GaN-based PAs such as the NPT1007 GaN transistor (Figure 10). Its frequency span of DC to 1200 MHz makes it suitable for both wideband and narrowband RF applications. It typically operates from a single supply between 14 and 28 V, providing 18 dB small-signal gain at 900 MHz. It is designed to tolerate a 10:1 SWR (standing wave ratio) mismatch with no device degradation.

Image of NPT1007 GaN PA from MACOM

Figure 10: The NPT1007 GaN PA from MACOM spans the range of DC to 1200 MHz, making it suitable for both wideband and narrowband RF applications. Designers get additional support through a variety of load-pull graphs. (Image source: MACOM)

In addition to the graphs showing performance basics at 500, 900, and 1200 MHz, the NPT1007 is supported by a variety of "load-pull" graphs to help circuit and system designers who are striving to ensure a robust product (Figure 11). Load-pull tests are done using a paired signal source and signal analyzer (spectrum analyzer, power meter, or vector receiver).

The test requires varying the impedance as seen by device under test (DUT) to assess the PA’s performance (covering factors such as output power, gain, and efficiency) as any associated component values can change due to temperature shifts, or as a result of variations within the tolerance bands around their nominal values.

Image of load-pull graph for the MACOM NPT1007 PA

Figure 11: The load-pull graph for the NPT1007 PA goes beyond the standard table of min/max/typical specifications to show PA performance as its load impedance shifts away from its nominal value, a situation which will occur in actual use due to initial production tolerances and as well as thermal drift. (Image source: MACOM)

Regardless of the PA process used, the device's output impedance must be fully characterized by the vendor so the designer can match it properly to the antenna for maximum power transfer, and to keep SWR as close to unity as possible. This matching circuit is primarily made up of capacitors and inductors, and these may be implemented as discrete devices, or fabricated as part of the pc-board or even the product packaging. They must also be designed to sustain the PA power levels as well. Again, the use of tools such as the Smith chart are essential to understand and implement the required impedance matching.

Due to the PA’s small die size and high power levels, packaging is a critical issue. As shown earlier, many PAs support heatsinking via wide, heat dissipating package leads and flanges, as well as a thermal slug under the package to act as a path to the pc-board copper. At higher power levels (above about 5 to 10 W), the PA may have a copper cap to allow the heatsink to be mounted on top, and fans or other advanced cooling techniques may be needed.

The power ratings and small size associated with GaN PAs means that modeling the thermal environment is critical. Of course, it's not enough to keep the PA itself within allowable case or junction temperature ratings. Any heat that is removed from the PA must not become a problem for other parts of the circuit and system. Consideration must be given to address and resolve the entire thermal path.

Conclusion

RF-based systems, ranging from smartphones to VSAT terminals and phase-array radar systems, are pushing the limits of LNA and PA performance. This has driven device manufacturers to move beyond silicon to explore GaAs and GaN to provide the performance required.

These new process technologies are providing designers with devices having wider bandwidths, smaller footprints, and greater efficiency. However, designers need to understand the basics of LNA and PA operation in order to effectively apply these new technologies.

Disclaimer: The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the various authors and/or forum participants on this website do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of DigiKey or official policies of DigiKey.

WIFI Frequency

 In the 2.4 GHz band, the lower frequencies that are transmitted here can more easily penetrate solid objects, meaning the signal can be better carried out throughout your home. WiFi network speed— The higher frequency 5 GHz band makes up for its shorter range with much faster WiFi speeds than the 2.4 GHz band.

Sunday, November 30, 2014

ROPEX "THE FIRST" 136kHz TRANSMITTER

ROPEX "THE FIRST" 136kHz TRANSMITTER
Use of the 136kHz band has been rising steadily over the last year and many stations are now active. Many more would like to get on the band, but do not have the time and/or inclination to home-brew a transmitter. The introduction of the first off-the-shelf transmitter for 136 should enable them to get started.
The fact that a commercial TX is readily available doesn’t solve all the problems though, at present there is no LF ATU, SWR meter or aerial available and these will have to be constructed before any useful signal will be radiated! Some tips on getting started are included at the end of this review.

DESCRIPTION
Ropex’s "the First" is a compact rig measuring 200mm wide x 90mm high x 175mm deep with a clamshell type metal case finished in olive green, having an internal frame upon which the major components are mounted. The front panel has only an on/off switch, a low/high tx power switch and a key socket to play with, plus some indicator lights. The rear panel is even sparser with only an aerial socket, a receiver socket, a fuse and the captive power lead. Simplictity is definitely a watchword here.
Delving inside reveals a well laid-out double-sided PCB onto which all the components are mounted. The output mosfets are clamped to an L shaped heatsink which is in the full draught from a small computer type fan mounted on the rear panel.
I was disappointed to see that the manufacturers had filed the type number off the driver chip making identification difficult, there’s no circuit provided so what do we do if it fails? Other worries were the fact that the large toroidal output transformer is supported merely by its wires - a long bumpy trip in the back of a car may cause some of the connections to fracture - also there was no earth strap to the back panel where the aerial socket is mounted, so the RF current has to flow all round the case to get there - keep the screws tight!
The neat internal construction of the Ropex revealed. The red output transformer can be seen near the back. The two large cores at the front right are the output filter inductors. You can just see the fixed crystal between the two ICs on the left.

TESTING
First I tested the rig into a dummy load. I connected the red and black cable to a suitable 12V 20A PSU (it’s a bit short so you’ll need to add a length via the supplied choc-block), connected a 50 Ohm dummy-load, connected a key and pressed! "The First" has a "VOX" type circuit and so goes onto tx automatically the first time you press the key, after a delay of about 1 second it drops back to receive. This seemed fine for the sort of speeds I use but may prove a bit long if you are going at 20wpm or so!
On a 12V supply and with the low/high button out, the rig drew around 3.5A and produced about 25W of RF, with the button in it rose to 15.8A and 136W. Using 13.8V the current rose to 17.5A and the output to 172W into 50 Ohms. This equates to a total efficiency of about 72%. This good efficiency is typical of a class D switching design.
The current in standby is about 250mA.
Checking the harmonic output revealed the expected lack of even harmonics from the square-wave PA and well suppressed odd harmonics. The third harmonic, which falls amongst the aeronautical beacons, was more than 35dB down which is very good for this kind of PA. It must be remembered that any 136kHz ATU will be very sharp and should remove the last vestiges of any harmonic energy.
Here we can see the fundamental and the second and third harmonics. The third harmonic is well suppressed at –35dB.

So far so good! The next step was to connect the tx to my aerial. I had checked that the SWR on 136.5 was OK before connecting the Ropex and so was most surprised to find that I couldn’t use the high power setting. The tx worked fine at low power producing about 30W but as soon as I switched to high power (button in, green light on) it produced a few Watts and drew hardly any current. My ATU has a tap a few turns up from the earthy-end of the coil where the 50 Ohm point is found. It seems that for some reason the protection circuit of "the First" does not like this arrangement. Reconfiguring the ATU as a simple series coil, although giving a slightly worse match, seemed to cure the problem. I later found that a 50 Ohm to 50 Ohm pi network between the tx and the ATU cured the problem and so was able to return my ATU to its normal state and continue with the tests. I have reproduced the circuit of the the pi network here as I regard the tapped coil as the best way of setting up an LF aerial, especially with kite aerials where the DC path to earth is essential to dissipate static.
Circuit of the test ATU. The main coil has 150 turns of 1.5mm o.d. plastic covered wire on a perspex cage former 200mm diameter. The 54uH inductor is 65 turns of 1mm wire on a T130-2 dust-iron core. The 12nF capacitors are made up from 10nF and 2n2 1000V "pulse" rated poly Cs.
Quite why the protection circuit reacts in this way I was unable to determine. It appears to sense the RF current at the output of the low pass filter in the tx and shut off the drive when the level gets too high. In normal use this equates to about 20A of DC input current.

ON THE AIR
Once the ATU was tamed I put out a few CQ calls, there is no side-tone so you have to listen to the transmitter on the receiver. This is not a problem if the station you are working is co channel but if they’re at the other end of the band you won’t hear anything when you key. Reports were good for the limited power and I liked the "VOX" facility. I was a little concerned about the hard keying shape, fearing that locals may notice some clicks, but my nearest local at 25 miles away was quite happy with the sound of the signal. Keying via the computer (for very slow CW) also worked well. The open-circuit voltage on the key socket is only 8V and the key-down current is about 12mA so it’s easy to drive with an opto-coupler or similar device.
Although the spec states that the tx frequency is 136.5kHz it is actually 136.54, being a crystal oscillator at 6.554Mhz divided by 48. If a number of operators buy these rigs this will become a rather congested frequency! It is therefore annoying to find that the crystal is difficult to remove being soldered into the board with its case soldered down to the earth plane. If a socket had been fitted, crystal changing would have been easier and a VFO or synthesiser could have been plugged in. Perhaps "the Second" will incorporate this feature! Whilst I’m grumbling, the instruction leaflet provided is not exactly comprehensive. It consists of one sheet of paper with a very abbreviated set of directions and, as previously mentioned, no circuits. I have therefore included a little more information on tuning up.

GETTING TUNED UP.
A simple tapped coil is the usual ATU for LF. The likely length of aerial wire in use will be a tiny fraction of a quarter wave and will appear as a high impedance with capacitive reactance, just like a short whip on topband. The number of turns required will depend on what diameter of former you happen to have and what length of wire you are attempting to tune up.
The test loading coil as described. It has an inductance of about 3mH.
About 3mH is a good start with taps every ten turns or so near the top of the coil and every turn for the first 6 turns at the bottom. You will notice that no tuning C is used, one could be used but it would have to be a very wide-spaced one, the impedance is so high that 10kV of RF is possible with the comparatively low output of the Ropex.
Most aerial systems alter in resonance with the weather, wet days it’ll go LF and dry ones it’ll go HF, therefore you are going to need some way of making fine adjustments. If you don’t have an old broadcast transmitter vacuum variable C available then the best bet is a home-brew variometer.
Home made variometer using sticky-tape and ball-pen technology ( I used an old pen body for the shaft.)
The variometer pictured is made from a piece of 4" diameter plastic pipe ("stench pipe" as I heard it charmingly called…) with another, 3" dia coil able to rotate inside it. The inner coil is wired in series with the outer one and, as it is rotated, it either adds to or subtracts from the total inductance. Mine has a range of 60 to 140uH, more than enough to keep the aerial on resonance in most conditions. Don’t use any metal parts (except the wire of course!) in the construction or they will arc, plastic is best and ensure that you can adjust the thing without getting your fingers too close to the wire, RF burns hurt!
To get the atu somewhere near, tune to the German data transmission on about 138.8kHz (a carrier with an occasional data burst) and set the atu taps for the loudest signal with the variometer in the centre of its travel (inner coil at 90° ). If all is well the tuning will be quite sharp and the signal should be S9+.
Start with the low-power setting on the tx and key up. If you have an aerial current meter, a small peak should coincide with a dip in reflected power. Optimise the SWR with the earthy-end taps (you will need the pi-network in cct if your tx reacts the same way as mine). The tx should be drawing just under 4A. When you are happy with that, switch to high power (Ropex warn not to operate the power switch with the key pressed) and try again. If there are no flash-overs and the SWR stays good then the tx should be drawing just under 15A, a slight tweak on the variometer should get this right.
Many HF SWR bridges will give a useful indication of SWR although the actual power readings will be low. My old Daiwa 620 reads 8W when the Ropex is producing its 140 Watts.

CONCLUSION
The "First" is a useful little transmitter, neatly made, very efficient and with some nice features but it has its limitations. The complete lack of any monitoring built into the rig means extra bits and pieces need to be bought or constructed before it can be operated satisfactorily. If I were keeping it I would reduce the speed of the fan a little. Although the noise it makes is not offensive, just a rushing sound with no distracting note, it is quite loud. Having had a couple of long QSOs I could detect no heating of anything in the rig so there is certainly no lack of cooling!
It must also be noted that 130W or so is not an awful lot of power with which to radiate a signal on the 136kHz band, a good aerial is going to be required to work DX.
The biggest drawback, however, is the fixed frequency. I appreciate that the addition of a VXO or VFO would have increased the price considerably but the difficulty of changing the crystal is a great shame. A mark two with a switch and an external crystal socket would be my suggestion.
If you want to get going on 136 and can live with the shortcomings give a Ropex a try, I think it’s good value and as well as being "the First" it’s also the Only!

The Ropex "the First" is available from Nevada 01705 662 145

Dave Pick G3YXM
Published in "Radio Today" magazine in June 1999.

Monday, October 27, 2014

OZ2OE Technical Home Page - 144 MHz low noise amplifier. with BF981.

OZ2OE Technical Home Page - 144 MHz low noise amplifier.

Uploaded April 19'th 2000

Design of a preamplifier for 144 MHz with 1 dB NF and 23 dB gain using BF981.

The finished amplifier.

Background

This amplifier is using a low cost silicon MOSFET (BF981 from Philips) to give more than 20 dB gain with around 1 dB noise figure on 2 meter.
You can build more advanced low noise amplifiers using GaAs FET's, but the dual gate MOSFET is no bad performer - the difference in noise figure may not even show up on terrestrial path. Besides it's a lot more forgiving in terms of accidental destruction - and it's cheaper!

Mechanical design

The amplifier is build on a double sided board measuring 25x50 mm. The upper side functions as a ground plane and the traces are on the lower side.
The board can either be build into the radio or mounted in a small metal box with BNC connectors.
The amplifier is build on a small PCB.

Electrical design

The diagram is shown below. The input circuit is a series transformation, the output circuit a "normal" parallel circuit with a capacitive output tap. As this amplifer has high gain, there is provision for a pi-attenuator on the output. Biasing of the transistor is done with a source resistor/voltage divider and with voltage dividers on both gate1 and gate2. This circuit tightly controls the DC parameters of the transistor.
L2, L3: 5.25 turn ø0.25 mm cu-wire on Neosid form K3312, F100 slug.

Circuit details

The input circuit is a bit unusual as it uses a series inductor L2 to step the 50 ohm generator impedance up to 1600 ohm, which is the optimum gate impedance for noise matching. L2 resonates with C4 in parallel with the gate1 input capacitance.
This minimises the loaded Q of the input circuit - important to keep insertion loss down - and the correct impedance (noise) match is fixed by design.The output circuit is a parallel circuit with with L3, C6 and C8. The capacitive tap C6/C8 sets the drain impedance to 2 kohm. This also determines the gain.

Component layout.

Tune up

When powering up for the first time, start by checking the DC current consumption of abt. 20 mA. Then adjust L2 and L3 for maximum signal.
For best noise match use a weak unmodulated signal and a receiver in FM mode. Then tune only L2 for best noise suppression.
By using a signal at the noise threshold, the FM (or PM) detector in the receiver will "amplify" any improvement of the C/N, so you can tune for optimum noisefigure by ear! Any resulting variation of the preamplifier gain will be nullified by the limiter in the FM receiver.

Attenuator

The can be taylored to your specific needs - which should be "not more than enough" - by having an attenuator at the output of the amplifier. The following table shows resistor values for different attenuation.
PI - attenuator values.

Performance

I have build and measured many of these amplifiers, and they have almost identical performance.
The typical result with a 3-dB output attenuator is shown here:
Noise figure and gain from 130 to 160 MHz. NF is 1.3 dB and gain 20 dB on 145 MHz.

PCB's and components

When I have the PCB layout converted to a proper file format, I'm going to post it here - until then the best I can offer, is a scan of the original artwork. Ask me.
At the moment I'm unable to help with etched PCB's, however I still have the special Neosid coil forms and cans.
Back to OZ2OE homepage.